提示:点击上方"您的公众号名称"↑免费订阅本微信推广平台
课堂教学案例
To help students to express themselves in the argumentative writing.
To develop the students’abilities of applying the writing structure on other topics.
Play the video.
Ask what the main idea is.
Introduce more ways of study.
Introduce some new words.
Watch the video.
Say the key words in the video.
Think about other ways of study.
Learn the new words.
To help students have a better understanding of the passage.
To help students grasp the structure of the passage.
To develop students’dialectical mind.
Check if students understand the passage through fast reading and detailed reading.
Ask students to find the main idea of the passage and each paragraph.
Let students find the advantages and disadvantages of study on the Internet.
Ask students to guess the content of paragraph 4 and show the original text after discussion.
Let Students to give the title of the passage.
Match four paragraphs with their main ideas.
Work in pairs.
To Help students understand the structure of the passage by drawing a picture.
Lead Students to find the connective words, such as to begin with, what's more, last but not least, however, in addition, finally.
Group the students and ask each group to write a passage about another topic by using the given structure.
Help students do a group writing and let each student write one part of the passage.
Invite several groups to present their passages and other students give comments on their performance.
Work on the task according to the task descriptions in groups.
Some present the passages in class and others listen carefully and give comments.
Task Paper
反复学习高老师的教学设计,收获很多。
Warming-up and leading-in环节中,教师通过放视频使学生,引导学生抓关键词,通过师生交流、学习新词,为有效学习文本学习做好铺垫。学生多感官参与学习,有“watch,think,say and learn”确保了学习的有效性。
Reading环节活动设计层层递进,体现了学生思维参与的深度,保证了学习的有效性,学习方法的有效渗透。此环节通过学生速读抓主要信息,细读找段落大意,Pairwork发现advantages,disadvantages,猜出第四段内容,最后给出文本题目。层层递进的活动设计和阅读策略的渗透,加上全员参与,为有效学习提供了保障。
Group writing环节是输出活动。学生基于任务进行小组活动,共同完成一个passage。写,作为输出活动,在此做到了人人参与。既有人人一句的写作,还有真实的学习展示交流,更有学生之间的互评,这是有效的、真实的学习交流,是很好的输出。另外,仔细阅读张老师和高老师的交流,我又学到很多。
非常同意各位老师对于教学目标、教学材料、教学活动的讨论,相同观点我不再重复。我基于Dale的经验之锥分析高超老师课例中的学生学习活动。
高老师一开始用视频导入,这是对所看内容掌握率30%的watch video活动,作为导入活动,效果不错。
然后是阅读活动,这是阅读课,必须有这个环节,尽管学生对所读内容的掌握率只有10%,还在读的过程中有两人一组的讨论,而且有填入语句,这是有效率70%的hands-on,对前面的阅读是一个补充,遗憾的是,动手时间较短。
然后是在老师引导下完成文章结构图分析,这是对所听所看掌握率50%的attend an exhibit和watch a demo(看老师完成结构图)。
之后是对所做内容掌握率达到90%的Model a real experience。
所以整节课效率非常高。这节课我在现场观摩学习,看到学生都能写出与范文结构一致的文章,达到学习所读文章结构进行写作的读写目标。
但较为遗憾的是,这个写作活动的范文的“典范”性不够。这样,尽管学习活动很有效,但学习的范本不够典范,导致学习成效不是很高,就像学生跟我学打篮球一样,即使学习活动再有效,成效也不会很高;而跟姚明学打篮球,即使学习活动效率不是很高,但成效依然会很高。
所以,这节课如果需要调整,需要调整的不是学习活动,而是文本选择。
当然,基于现有文本,也可以开展有控制的教学。从现有文本出发,我有一个与高老师略微不同的教学设计,主要是分散阅读时间,穿插有效性较高的hands-on活动在阅读之中,从而提高对写作技能的掌握率(这里不是培养阅读能力,而是培训写作能力):
当然,我的这一设计显得太朴实,若是需要,可以使用计算机技术等加以优化。